|  |

| |

Enabling better global research outcomes in soil, plant & environmental monitoring.

Ready to Go Lysimeter

The Ready-to-go Lysimeter is a small lysimeter station for soil columns with an area of up to 0.5 m² and a length of up to 0.9m.

The RTG lysimeter is suitable both for disturbed soil (filled by hand) and for undisturbed soil monoliths when using the patented UGT extraction technology. The compact lysimeter station consists of a PE-HD lysimeter vessel with weighing system and seepage tank with tipping bucket, a weather station, a data logger and a range of soil hydrological sensors. The system operates as plug and play system, so that the entire station can be erected and put into operation without special tools or specialist personnel. The data are displayed on the internet using the SVADSS online data management system. Up to four Ready-to-go Lysimeters can be connected to one data logger. The RTG-Lysimeter is the ideal supplement to an existing weather station for directly calculating evaporation.

Available Sizes: Ø = 30 cm / Length = 30 cm
Ø = 30 cm / Length = 60 cm
Ø = 30 cm / Length = 90 cm
Ø = 80 cm / Length = 30 cm
Ø = 80 cm / Length = 60 cm
Ø = 80 cm / Length = 90 cm
Lysimeter Vessel: Polypropylene
Measurement Range
Weight: 0 to 100 kg
Soil Moisture: 0 to 60% Volumetric (0 to 100% with limited accuracy)
Temperature: -40 to +80°C
Tension: 0 to 200 kPa
Seepage Measurement
Measurement principle: tipping counter
Measurement range: 0 to 1 L/min for 30 cm Ø
0 to 5 L/min for 80 cm Ø
Seepage reservoir: 17 L
Sampling: manually with external pump, external automated sampling solutions optionally available

300mm d RTG 800mm d RTG

Ready-To-Go Lysimeter versus Smart Field Lysimeter

Ready-To-Go Lysimeter Smart Field Lysimeter
Measurement Principle
Weighable Lysimeter with tipping counter, soil moisture sensors and tension sensors Weighable Lysimeter with weighing system for seepage, soil moisture sensors and tension sensors
Soil Monolith
Available Sizes:
Ø = 30 cm / Length = 30 cm
Ø = 30 cm / Length = 60 cm
Ø = 30 cm / Length = 90 cmØ = 80 cm / Length = 30 cm
Ø = 80 cm / Length = 60 cm
Ø = 80 cm / Length = 90 cm
+ Available Sizes:
Ø = 30 cm / Length = 30 cm
Ø = 30 cm / Length = 60 cm
Ø = 30 cm / Length = 90 cm
Undisturbed Soil Monolith (30cm diameter only)
Can be done by the customer using the provided cutting ring and a machine for lifting and pressing (eg: small excavator)Disturbed, manually filled soil
Can be done by the customer without special tools or specific expertise
O Undisturbed Soil Monolith
Can be done by the customer using the provided excavation tools and a machine for lifting (eg: small excavator or forklift)
Lysimeter Vessel
Polypropylene Stainless Steel
Steel has a higher thermal conductivity than polypropylene. Therefore temperature transfer from the surface may influence the temperature regime in the soil, especially for small lysimeters. The importance of that influence depends on the aim of the application. A polypropylene solution is less expensive than a stainless steel vessel and therefore especially reasonable for projects with several lysimeters or with planned exchange of the lysimeter vessels for several tests in a row.
Lower Boundary Condition
Optionally available as suction plate with membrane
Planar Control
Available as just suction or bidirectional control
+ Bidirectional control of temperature and water regime via silicon carbide suction cup grate
Linear control along the suction cups
Seepage Measurement
Integrated in lysimeter station O External in field box O
Measurement Principle: Tipping counter Measurement Principle: Weighing
Measurement Range: 0 to 1 L/min for 30cm Ø
0 to 5 L/min for 80cm Ø
Measurement Range: 0 to 10 kg
Seepage Reservoir: 17 L Seepage Reservoir: 10L
Sampling: Manually with external pump, external automated sampling optionally available Sampling: Automated sampling optionally available
Measurement Range
Weight: 0 to 100 kg O Weight: 0 to 50 kg / 0 to 100 kg / 0 to 200 kg, depending on lysimeter length O
Soil Moisture: 0 to 60% volumetric (0 to 100% with limited accuracy) Soil Moisture: Dielectric Permittivity ɛ = 1 to 80
Temperature: -40 to +80°C Temperature: -40 to +50°C
Tension: 0 to 200 kPa Tension: 100 to 500 kPa
Measurement Profiles
Two for 30cm lysimeter length
Three for 60cm/90cm lysimeter length
Two sensors on each level
O Three measurement levels
Two sensors at each level
Control Station/Data Logger
Four different control stations available in adjustment to the planned project:

  • Only Control
  • Control and Climate Sensors
  • Control and Lower Boundary System
  • Control, Climate Sensors and Lower Boundary System

Up to four lysimeters can be connected to one Control Station.

+ Data Logger in combination with field box for control pump.
Meteorological information requires and external weather station.
Up to four lysimeters and four field boxes can be connected to one data logger
Power Supply
Rechargeable battery and solar panel O Rechargeable battery and solar panel O
Remote Data Transmission
Optional – in combination with SVADSS data base solutions are available. O Optional O
The main advantage of the Ready-To-Go lysimeter is the availability of a bugger surface area. The Ready-To-Go lysimeter also offers more possibilities for the adjustment to the planned use and thus a more efficient use of available budget.

Balykin, D., Puzanov, A., Stephan, E., & Meissner, R. (2014). Using the Innovative Lysimeter Technology in the German-Russian Research Project “KULUNDA”. Novel Methods for Monitoring and Managing Land and Water Resources in Siberia, 387-399. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24409-9_16

Bethge-Steffens, D., Meissner, R., & Rupp, H. (2004). Development and Practical Test of a Weighable Groundwater Lysimeter for Floodplain Sites. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 167(4), 516-524. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200321304

Dietrich, O., Fahle, M., & Seyfarth, M. (2016). Behavior of water balance components at sites with shallow groundwater tables: Possibilities and limitations of their simulation using different ways to control weighable groundwater lysimeters. Agricultural Water Management, 163, 75-89. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.09.005

Hagenau, J., Meissner, R., & Borg, H. (2015). Effect of Exposure on the Water Balance of Two Identical Lysimeters. Journal of Hydrology, 520, 69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.030

Huot, H., Simonnot, M. O., Sere, G., Charbonnier, P., & Morel, J. L. (2015). Lysimeter Monitoring as Assessment of the Potential for Revegetation to Manage Former Iron Industry Settling Ponds. Science of the Total Environment, 526, 29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.025

Marc-Oliver, A., Thiele-Bruhn, S., Seeger, J., Godlinski, F., Meissner, R., & Leinweber, P. (2010). Sulfonamides Leach from Sandy Loam Soils Under Common Agricultural Practice. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 211(1-4), 143-156. doi: 10.1007/s11270-009-0288-1

Matušek, I., Reth, S., Heerdt, C., Hrčková, K., & Gubiš, J. (2016). Lysimeter – A Unique Tool for Monitoring the Interactions Among the Components of Environment. Proceedings of National Aviation University, 67(2), 69-75. doi: 10.18372/2306-1472.67.10436

Meissner, R., Rupp, H., & Schubert, M. (2000). Novel Lysimeter Techniques – a Basis for the Improved Investigation of Water, Gas and Solute Transport in Soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 163(6), 603-608. doi: 10.1002/1522-2624(200012)163:6<603::AID-JPLN603>3.0.CO;2-K

Meissner, R., Rupp, H., & Seyfarth, M. (2008). Advances In Out Door Lysimeter Techniques. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus, 8(2), 217-225. doi: 10.1007/s11267-007-9166-2

Meissner, R., Rupp, H., & Seyfarth, M. (2014). Advanced Technologies in Lysimetry. Novel Measurement and Assessment Tools for Monitoring and Management of Land and Water Resources in Agricultural Landscapes of Central Asia, 159-173. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-01017-5_8

Meissner, R., Rupp, H., Seeger, J., Ollesch, G., & Gee, G. W. (2010). A comparison of water flux measurements: passive wick-samplers versus drainage lysimeters. European Journal of Soil Science, 61(4), 609-621. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01255.x

Meissner, R., Seeger, J., Rupp, H., Seyfarth, M., & Borg, H. (2007). Measurement of dew, fog, and rime with a high-precision gravitation lysimeter. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 170(3), 335-344. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200625002

Meissner, R., Prasad, M. V. N., Du Laing, G., & Rinklebe, J. (2010). Lysimeter application for measuring the water and solute fluxes with high precision. Current Science, 99(5), 601-607.

Ngo, V. V., Latifi, M. A., & Simonnot, M. (2013). Estimability Analysis and Optimisation of Soil Hydraulic Parameters from Field Lysimeter Data. Transport in Porous Media, 98(2), 485-504. doi: 10.1007/s11242-013-0155-9

Ngo, V. V., Michel, J., Lucas, L., Latifi, A., & Simonnot, M. (2014). Sensitivity, estimability and correlation of parameters describing equilibrium and nonequilibrium transports of bromide tracer in the field lysimeter. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 19(4), 445-466. doi: 10.1080/19648189.2014.950759

Perez-Priego, O., Migliavacca, M., El-Madany, T., Carrara, A., Moreno, G., & Kolle, O. R., M. (2016). Failure of correct evapotranspiration measurements by eddy covariance under certain conditions and energy balance closure in open-oak savanna ecosystems. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts, 18, 14826.

Reth, S., Gierig, M., Winkler, J. B., Mueller, C. W., Nitsche, C., & Seyfarth, M. (2007). Lysimeter Soil Retriever (LSR) – A tool for investigation on heterogeneity of the migration and structural changes. Proceedings of the 19th World Congress of Soil Science: Soil solutions for a changing world, Brisbane, Australia, 1-6 August 2010. Symposium 3.2. 2 Improved water and soil management using lysimeters, 44-47.

Reth, S., Graf, W., Gefke, O., Schilling, R., Seidlitz, H. K., & Munch, J. C. (2007). Whole-year-round Observation of N2O Profiles in Soil: A Lysimeter Study. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus, 8(2), 129-137. doi: 10.1007/s11267-007-9165-3

Rupp, H., Meissner, R., Leinweber, P., Lennartz, B., & Seyfarth, M. (2007). Design and Operability of a Large Weighable Fen Lysimeter. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 186(1-4), 323-335. doi: 10.1007/s11270-007-9488-8

Rupp, H., Rinklebe, J., Bolze, S., & Meissner, R. (2010). A scale-dependent approach to study pollution control processes in wetland soils using three different techniques. Ecological Engineering, 36(10), 1439-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.06.024

Sere, G., Ouvrard, S., Magnenet, V., Pey, B., Schwartz, C., & Morel, J. L. (2012). Predictability of the Evolution of the Soil Structure using Water Flow Modeling for a Constructed Technosol. Vadose Zone Journal, 11(1). doi: 10.2136/vzj2011.0069

Seyfarth, M., & Reth, S. (2007). Lysimeter Soil Retriever (LSR) – An Application of a New Technique for Retrieving Soils from Lysimeters. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution: Focus, 8(2), 227-231. doi: 10.1007/s11267-007-9161-7

Shaheen, S., Rinklebe, J., Rupp, H., & Meissner, R. (2014). Lysimeter trials to assess the impact of different flood-dry-cycles on the dynamics of pore water concentrations of As, Cr, Mo and V in a contaminated floodplain soil. Geoderma, 228-229, 5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.12.030

Torrento, C., Bakkour, R., Ryabenko, E., Ponsin, V., Prasuhn, V., Hofstetter, T. B., . . . Hunkeler, D. (2015). Fate of Four Herbicides in an Irrigated Field Cropped with Corn: Lysimeter Experiments. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science, 13, 158-161. doi: 10.1016/j.proeps.2015.07.03

Xiao, H., Meissner, R., Seeger, J., Rupp, H., & Borg, H. (2009). Effect of vegetation type and growth stage on dewfall, determined with high precision weighing lysimeters at a site in northern Germany. Journal of Hydrology, 377(1-2), 43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.006

Xiao, H., Meissner, R., Seeger, J., Rupp, H., & Borg, H. (2009). Testing the precision of a weighable gravitation lysimeter. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 172(2), 194-200. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200800084